To make it clear: I will not use the next waypoint panel, the number in the distance panel is enough for me - so I donât care about this discussion here anyway. And I wonât say anything more about the fontsize either. Not to mention the overlay apps, which steal the last bit of your map.
But: The numbering of the waypoints should remain as it is - basta!
As already mentioned recently: Why donât you name your x waypoints as you want them, e.g. â(4) Burg RâŚâ? Then would appear: â113.9 km - 11. (4) Burg RâŚâ.
Just to save this little effort, all here should âdance to your tuneâ? Strange.
Because we are in beta mode - Iâd like if Emux goes back to âwaypoint xxâ âŚ
actually I wanted to ignore your comments, but this is a personal attack, which violates the forum guidelines. There seem to be people who have to give their two cents about everything, even if itâs inappropriate, such as contact lenses in response to font size, and who canât stand it when someone disagrees with them.
Very good to put the panel next waypoint and the distance .
As for adding the waypoint number to the name I donât think itâs necessary, as I put the name I want to see just name and no need to add anything else (except the distance in front as it comes out now).
As for the waypoint example if I put the name âBurg Ramsteinâ I would like to see â112.5 km ⢠Burg Ramsteinâ and not â112.5 km ⢠11.Burg Ramsteinâ, in this second case there are two numbers too close that can lead to confusion when taking a quick look at gps.
If we leave the original name now shows us â1.2 km ⢠1. Waypointâ, I like more â1.2 km ⢠Waypoint 1â
I would also ask if the distance can be shown in the waypoints list
